File:  <toolsbro.htm>                                                                                       <Migrations Index>        
<Bronze
Age Index>           Archeology
Index        <American Archeology>
 
 
| ABSCENCE OR SCARCITY OF BRONZE AND      IRON AGE TOOLS IN AMERICA   [Contacts]            The scarcity of bronze tools
  among the artifacts found in America has not been fully explained, and this
  has argued against contacts with the Old World during the Bronze Age.  Artifacts that have been found that may
  date back to the end of the Bronze Age may be viewed at (Photo).   It may be that heavy objects of this kind
  were not regularly transported in the various sea craft used to cross the
  Atlantic, even though they certainly would have been desirable items of
  trade.  As Bronze Age Magalithic
  people from Europe crossed the Atlantic by the northern island-hopping route
  during the period of milder and less stormy climate that ended about 1200
  B.C., heavy, angular objects such as bronze tools, would be prone to puncture
  lightweight and frail watercraft made of animal skins that may have been
  used.  By the beginning of the Iron
  Age and the development of sturdier wooden sea craft, transport would have
  been possible.  This may account for
  the iron ax that has been found.(see Iron Ax)         
  Claus Oldag judged that because bronze especially does not rapidly
  corrode or deteriorate when buried in soil or submerged under water, tools
  made thereof will eventually be found if searched for in the right
  places.  Also, the numbers of
  travelers to America from the Eastern Hemisphere in Pre-Columbian times would
  not have been large so that statistically the possibility of finding
  settlements or campsites where tools were mislaid on the huge American
  continents is very low.          
  Mike White has proposed the following on the subject of ancient tools
  in America.  “The 'iron age' is an
  elusive term.  There is an excellent chance that the people of the
  golden age and the age of silver knew of iron, but rejected using it because
  they had better alloys.  Mainstream scholars deny that there was a
  golden or age of silver, but they are mostly aware that in prehistoric times
  metallurgy was advanced to the degree that they had a copper alloy superior
  to iron in many ways.  This technology has been lost.  Iron rusts
  and corrodes away, so it should be no surprise that few iron artifacts from
  ancient times are found. “          
  “Many prehistoric iron furnaces have been found in America,
  particularly in Ohio.  They outlasted the tools and weapons that were
  smelted and forged there.  The Etowah mounds of Georgia did contain iron
  relics.  South America had advanced metallurgy, and they could have had
  the lost copper alloy, plus bronze, and they were very skilled artisans in
  gold and silver works.   The walls of Puma Punko had
  sophisticated alloys holding the huge stones together.  Tons of silver
  alloys were holding the blocks of Tiawanaku together, causing the Spaniards
  to destroy much in search of them. “          
  “Iron diffusion would be impossible to prove or disprove. 
  Scholars can read of Desoto and other early Spanish expeditions, where they
  resmelted their iron for reuse.  Any early iron items would have been
  remelted several times thru the centuries for horseshoes and swords, or
  plows.  Early settlers would have placed utilitarian needs before
  keeping such in cabinets for historical purposes. “   |